<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Images and Notes &#187; photoart</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jameshowephotography.com/blog/tag/photoart/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jameshowephotography.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:21:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Watercolor</title>
		<link>http://jameshowephotography.com/blog/2010/07/watercolor.html/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=watercolor</link>
		<comments>http://jameshowephotography.com/blog/2010/07/watercolor.html/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 12:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Howe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Automobiles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Automotive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[car]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Color]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoshop]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jameshowephotography.com/?p=607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like to take pictures of classic automobiles but dealing with lighting conditions that you can't control, reflections of cars and people, etc. can make it difficult to get a nice final image. I like to focus on the details which make these cars so interesting and sometimes the reflections are really a distraction. In the image above, I actually liked the reflections. The picture shows a 1932 Packard Stationery Coupe on display at the Classic Car Club of America (CCCA) show held at the Gilmore Car Musuem near Kalamazoo, Michigan. I took the shot primarily because I liked the way the reflections looked in the curve of the spare tire holder and other places on the car.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="thickbox" rel="same-post-607" title = "Watercolor" href="http://jameshowephotography.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/DSC2511-Edit-blog.jpg"><img src="http://jameshowephotography.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/DSC2511-Edit-blog.jpg" alt="" title="Watercolor" width="532" height="800" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-611" /></a></p>
<p class='exif'>(Nikon D700, 70-300mm at 112mm, ISO 250, Exposure 1/60 sec @f/11)</p>
<p>I like to take pictures of classic automobiles but dealing with lighting conditions that you can&#8217;t control, reflections of cars and people, etc. can make it difficult to get a nice final image.  I like to focus on the details which make these cars so interesting and sometimes the reflections are really a distraction.  In the image above, I actually liked the reflections.  The picture shows a 1932 Packard Stationery Coupe on display at the <a href="http://www.classiccarclub.org/">Classic Car Club of America (CCCA)</a> show held at the <a href="http://www.gilmorecarmuseum.org">Gilmore Car Musuem</a> near Kalamazoo, Michigan.  I took the shot primarily because I liked the way the reflections looked in the curve of the spare tire holder and other places on the car.</p>
<p>There is much debate among photographers about whether to get the image right &#8216;in camera&#8217; or &#8216;fix it later&#8217;.  My feeling has always been that for many images getting it right &#8216;in camera&#8217; simply means getting the composition and exposure that will allow you to develop the image in later steps, whether that be in a wet darkroom or a digital darkroom.  In the case of this image, I knew that I liked the reflections and when I saw the image I imagined more of a painting than a photograph.  I had a good idea of the processing that I would use on this.  In this case, I chose the <a href="http://topazlabs.com/simplify">Topaz Simplify</a> filter.  I looked at some of the presets including BuzSim, Painting &#8211; Oil and Painting &#8211; Watercolor and decided that the Watercolor came closest to what I had in mind.  I tweaked some of the settings and saved the image.  The original image was a bit washed out and I wanted a bit more color so I then applied a curves layer to give the image some more color and contrast.  If you compare the completed image above to the raw image below, I think you will see the difference it made.</p>
<p><a class="thickbox" rel="same-post-607" title = "Watercolor - Raw" href="http://jameshowephotography.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/DSC2511-raw.jpg"><img src="http://jameshowephotography.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/DSC2511-raw.jpg" alt="Watercolor - Raw" title="Watercolor - Raw" width="450" height="676" class="size-full wp-image-608" /></a></p>
<p>Someday, of course, I really should learn how to paint and create a real watercolor, but for now this will do.</p>
<p>As always, comments are welcome and encouraged.</p>
<p>Copyright &copy; 2010 James W. Howe &#8211; All rights reserved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jameshowephotography.com/blog/2010/07/watercolor.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

